<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Novartis Challenges Indian Patent Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.planetd.org/2006/12/22/novartis-challenges-indian-patent-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.planetd.org/2006/12/22/novartis-challenges-indian-patent-law/</link>
	<description>Critiquing the Politics, Policy &#38; Practice of Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:51:47 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: US Supreme Court Ruling on Patents has International Implications - The Discomfort Zone</title>
		<link>http://www.planetd.org/2006/12/22/novartis-challenges-indian-patent-law/comment-page-1/#comment-72406</link>
		<dc:creator>US Supreme Court Ruling on Patents has International Implications - The Discomfort Zone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 11:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetd.org/2006/12/22/novartis-challenges-indian-patent-law/#comment-72406</guid>
		<description>[...] most immediate relation can be seen to Novartis&#8217; challenge of the Indian patent law. Novartis&#8217; Gleevec patent was rejected in India on grounds that the drug was simply a minor [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] most immediate relation can be seen to Novartis&#8217; challenge of the Indian patent law. Novartis&#8217; Gleevec patent was rejected in India on grounds that the drug was simply a minor [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MSF Starts Petition against Novartis&#8217; Legal Challenge in India - The Discomfort Zone</title>
		<link>http://www.planetd.org/2006/12/22/novartis-challenges-indian-patent-law/comment-page-1/#comment-43912</link>
		<dc:creator>MSF Starts Petition against Novartis&#8217; Legal Challenge in India - The Discomfort Zone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetd.org/2006/12/22/novartis-challenges-indian-patent-law/#comment-43912</guid>
		<description>[...] SciDev.net reports that MÃ©decins Sans FrontiÃ¨res has launched a petition against the court case by Novartis against the Indian government (see previous post for details of the case). Aid organisation MÃ©decins Sans FrontiÃ¨res (Doctors Without Borders) is collecting signatures against a lawsuit filed by pharmaceutical company Novartis. The court case is scheduled for 29 January in Madras. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SciDev.net reports that MÃ©decins Sans FrontiÃ¨res has launched a petition against the court case by Novartis against the Indian government (see previous post for details of the case). Aid organisation MÃ©decins Sans FrontiÃ¨res (Doctors Without Borders) is collecting signatures against a lawsuit filed by pharmaceutical company Novartis. The court case is scheduled for 29 January in Madras. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethical Pharmaceutical Collaboration: A Catch-22 for Patent Law - The Discomfort Zone</title>
		<link>http://www.planetd.org/2006/12/22/novartis-challenges-indian-patent-law/comment-page-1/#comment-43869</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethical Pharmaceutical Collaboration: A Catch-22 for Patent Law - The Discomfort Zone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 17:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetd.org/2006/12/22/novartis-challenges-indian-patent-law/#comment-43869</guid>
		<description>[...] Yet, it also presents a catch-22 for both big pharma and proponents of weaker patent legislation. It is best illustrated by Novartis&#8217; challenge to India&#8217;s new patent law. Uphold the legality of this new method, and you allow Novartis&#8217; cancer drug Gleevec exclusive marketing rights in India, banning its many generic cousins. Disallow this new method, and you disallow drug development built upon existing molecules. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yet, it also presents a catch-22 for both big pharma and proponents of weaker patent legislation. It is best illustrated by Novartis&#8217; challenge to India&#8217;s new patent law. Uphold the legality of this new method, and you allow Novartis&#8217; cancer drug Gleevec exclusive marketing rights in India, banning its many generic cousins. Disallow this new method, and you disallow drug development built upon existing molecules. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Indian Pharma: Balancing Patent Rights and Obligations - The Discomfort Zone</title>
		<link>http://www.planetd.org/2006/12/22/novartis-challenges-indian-patent-law/comment-page-1/#comment-42083</link>
		<dc:creator>Indian Pharma: Balancing Patent Rights and Obligations - The Discomfort Zone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 07:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetd.org/2006/12/22/novartis-challenges-indian-patent-law/#comment-42083</guid>
		<description>[...] An analysis of the Indian Patent Act is particularly timely in view of Novartis&#8217; challenge to the new law. Section 1 of this report sets out, in great detail, the changes made to the Indian Patent Act in 2005, in order to comply with TRIPS requirements. It looks both at commonly understood flexibilities that India has used fully, e.g. pre- and post-grant opposition as well as others that it has not - e.g. compulsory licensing, or the Bolar exceptions. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] An analysis of the Indian Patent Act is particularly timely in view of Novartis&#8217; challenge to the new law. Section 1 of this report sets out, in great detail, the changes made to the Indian Patent Act in 2005, in order to comply with TRIPS requirements. It looks both at commonly understood flexibilities that India has used fully, e.g. pre- and post-grant opposition as well as others that it has not &#8211; e.g. compulsory licensing, or the Bolar exceptions. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dweep Chanana</title>
		<link>http://www.planetd.org/2006/12/22/novartis-challenges-indian-patent-law/comment-page-1/#comment-41465</link>
		<dc:creator>Dweep Chanana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 04:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetd.org/2006/12/22/novartis-challenges-indian-patent-law/#comment-41465</guid>
		<description>Hi Vatsan,
You are right...I have missed it. A quick Google search shows that will be another emerging front in the IPR wars. Would appreciate any references on the topic, or your posts if any.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Vatsan,<br />
You are right&#8230;I have missed it. A quick Google search shows that will be another emerging front in the IPR wars. Would appreciate any references on the topic, or your posts if any.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vatsan</title>
		<link>http://www.planetd.org/2006/12/22/novartis-challenges-indian-patent-law/comment-page-1/#comment-41395</link>
		<dc:creator>vatsan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 15:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetd.org/2006/12/22/novartis-challenges-indian-patent-law/#comment-41395</guid>
		<description>u seem to have missed the entire data exclusivity debate which is just as bad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>u seem to have missed the entire data exclusivity debate which is just as bad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
